|
The Penrose Illusion |
|
|
|
Sir Roger Penrose's Illusion is illustrated here in its simplest form. It appears to be three bars of square cross section joined to form a triangle. If you cover up any one corner of this figure, the three bars appear to be fastened together properly at right angles to each other at the other two corners–a
perfectly normal situation. But now if you slowly uncover a corner it
becomes apparent that deception is involved. These two bars which
connect at this corner wouldn't even be near each other if they were
joined properly at the
other two corners
|
| The Penrose illusion depends
on 'false perspective', the same kind used in
engineering `isometric' drawings. Some artists refer to it as `Chinese
perspective', because traditional Chinese art often used it. This kind of picture
displays an inherent ambiguity of depth, which we will call isometric depth
ambiguity.'
|
|
Isometric drawings represent all parallel lines as parallel, even
if they are tilted with respect to the observer. An object tilted away from the
observer by some angle looks the same as if were tilted toward the observer by
the same angle. A tilted rectangle has a two-fold ambiguity, as demonstrated by
Mach's figure (right) which may be seen as an open book with pages facing you,
or as the covers of a book, with the spine facing you. It may also be seen as
two symmetric parallelograms side by side and lying in a plane, but few people
describe it that way. |
|
|
The Thiery figure (above) illustrates the same
idea. |
|
Schroeder's reversible staircase illusion is a very `pure' example of isometric depth ambiguity. It may be perceived as a stairway which one could ascend from right to left, or as the underside of a stairway, seen from below. Any attempt to draw this with vanishing points would destroy the illusion. |
|
|
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Penrose Parallelograms is a tiling system invented in 1974 by English physicist, Sir Roger Penrose. Penrose was asking how can a tiling not repeat? How can shapes completely fill up an infinite space, but never have a repeating pattern? Penrose went on to ask, "What is the smallest number of shapes that could create an non-repeating infinite tiling?" Asking that question is remarkable. Answering it is astounding. Discovering that the answer is only two is both shocking and delightful. | |